I tried to avoid feeding it but this claim here in reply to me is too much and I give up: in addition to brave serving its own ads, the brave adblocker whitelists Google search ads and by coincidence has search deals. So it is good we have browsers that have native adblockers, but hopefully somehow, we will always have a browser that doesn’t just follow Google and want to be like google, obviously not caring about Ramp saying “So it is good we have browsers that have native adblockers, but hopefully somehow, we will always have a browser that doesn’t just follow Google and want to be like google, obviously not caring about users.”Įvery opportunity is good to advertise for brave it seems. This is one more reason why I don’t support open source projects too much and I am glad Brave browser has a decent adblocker and I will hope they add the few tiny features that are missing from the normal uBlock/Nano like procedural cosmetic might! they are able to, for sure.
#Add blocker browser software
I understand your point but in software and in the state of any project lately it is like “it is what it is”.
#Add blocker browser free
I do that with software that costs a lot of money because I stopped wanting to support the developer since I had problems with company practices or decisions they take, so doing that for a free product I guess it is easier since you don’t have to deal with any loss money or licensing problems or anything. Right now, we don’t even know what def.dev-nano website is about but it has a timer, so we will have to check exactly what happens in 35 days.īut like I said, all we can do is the same we can do with other software when they do something you don’t like, remove/uninstall them and move on. People will keep thinking that open source is positive because “you can check the code” but that doesn’t guarantee much when they can do the same good or dirty trick a closed source software does. Open source is like whatever to me, and this is another proof developers do whatever they want, and will always do whatever they want. in software it happens so many times and then what responsibility would a developer have if the developer already sold it? He sold pretty much the ‘nano’ name, and then what turkish developers do, it won’t be his responsibility anymore.īut if even the hundred and thousand dollar software do this, and you would have more right to complain since you paid for it, how can you blame the ‘free’ product that does the same?
the only ones having a good time lately on the open source are the big projects that are pretty much not free since they keep getting money from everywhere.īut In my experience this is what I see all the time, people sell and then the other people acquire the product. He was even thinking about abandoning the extension development so he is tired of it, like many are. Well, the problem is you want to see this as a “trust user” thing, what trust would he have? unless he wanted to develop something else in the future, I don’t think he cares much anymore. The Chromium versions of both Nano Adblocker and Nano Defender are malicious Heart These two could serve as a replacement, but as said, Nano Defender on Firefox can still be recommended. There are other uBlock Origin-compatible lists which achieve the same thing:Īdblock Warning Removal List (hit “Subscribe” in order to subscribe):įuck Fuckadblock (hit “Subscribe” in order to subscribe): So if you are on Firefox, you can keep Nano Defender and replace Nano Adblocker (which is abandoned now) with uBlock Origin.Ģ) Nano Defender serves the purpose of evading anti-adblock scripts. The maintainer of the Firefox versions has announced that development of Nano Adblocker will be put to rest on Firefox, but that he / she will continue to develop Nano Defender independently, possibly renaming it. The person maintaining the Firefox version is as sad about these ongoings as we all are. The Nano Adblocker and Nano Defender extensions on Firefox were not affected, because the Firefox versions are being maintained by someone else, more info here:
0 kommentar(er)
